#Cmaptools mapas conceptuales online full
#Cmaptools mapas conceptuales online software

“Aiding knowledge capture by searching for extensions of knowledge models”. “How users organize electronic fi les on their workstations in the offi ce environment: a preliminary study of personal information organization behaviour”. Luyt, Brendan Ee, Caroline Osman, Jamila Lim, Hui-Hui Yong, Sally. “Data unifi cation in personal information management”. Washington: Washington University Press, 2007. En: Cronin, Blaise (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 2007b, v. Keeping found things found: the study and practice of personal information management. “Finders, keepers? The present and future perfect in support of personal information management”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, v. “Towards memory supporting personal information management tools”. 29-32.Įlsweiler, David Ruthven, Ian Jones, Christopher. “Personal information systems: the library role”. “Searching to eliminate personal information management”. London: Springer, 2002.Ĭutrell, Edward Dumais, Susan T. Information spaces: the architecture of cyberspace. “Information behaviour that keeps found things found”. īruce, Harry Jones, William Dumais, Susan. “Personal, anticipated information need”. A croos-tool study of personal information management”. “Stuff goes into the computer and doesn’t come out. of London, 2004.īoardman, Richard Sasse, M. Doctoral Thesis, London: Imperial College, Univ. Improving Tool Support for Personal Information Management. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2008, v. “Information scraps: how and why information eludes our personal information management tools”. 4.īernstein, Michael Van Kllek, Max Karger, David Schraefel, Monica M. “Improved search engines and navigation preference in personal information management”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, v. “The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems design: evidence and implementations”. 872-878.īergman, Ofer Beyth-Marom, Ruth Nachmias, Rafi.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, v. “The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems”. 361-364.īergman, Ofer Beyth-Marom, Ruth Nachmias, Rafi. El profesional de la información, 2009, julio-agosto, v. ““Gestión” de información personal, no sólo “recuperación” de información personal”. “Introduction to keeping, refi nding and sharing personal information”.

#Cmaptools mapas conceptuales online full

Design, development, implementation and maintenanceĬheck full metadata for this record Referencesīarreau, Deborah et al. Information treatment for information services > IK. Information presentation: hypertext, hypermedia. Information treatment for information services > IG. Information use and sociology of information > BI. Information needs and information requirements analysis.ī. Information use and sociology of information > BH. Personal information management, Concept maps, User behaviour, Gestión de información personal, Comportamiento de usuarios, Herramientas de software, Mapas conceptuales.ī.

#Cmaptools mapas conceptuales online software

Se evalúa cualitativamente una aproximación basada en el uso de aplicaciones de software para mapas conceptuales como respuesta a los problemas planteados. Se revisaĮl concepto y problemas de la gestión de información personal, y las herramientas de software que se utilizan en la misma. La gestión de información personal (Personal information management, PIM) plantea problemas debido a que el software que se utiliza no parece responder adecuadamente a los comportamientos y actividades de los usuarios. A qualitative assessment explores whether an approach based on software tools for conceptual maps can address the problems discussed.

The concept and personal information management problems are reviewed, along with the software tools used for this task. Personal information management (PIM) raises some problems because the software tools that are used don’t adequately respond to user behaviour and activities.